Target date funds and custom models continue to dominate
Target-date solutions reached $1.77 trillion at year-end 2018, according to Sway Research.3 By 2021, 85% of participant contributions are expected to go to target-date strategies, and, by 2020, target-date strategies should have more assets than any other option in defined contribution plans. 1
Fueling their growth is a vast majority of participants automatically enrolled into target-date strategies as the qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). Auto-escalation programs and re-enrollment of participants into default target-date options have also driven up assets. 4
Custom target-date solutions continue to dominate target-date assets among the largest plans. Plans in the top 200 of the 1,000 largest plans in the country reported $185.1 billion in custom target-date strategies as of September 30, 2017, up 19.8% from a year earlier. This compares to $44 billion that was invested in off-the-shelf strategies as of September 30, 2017, up 36.6% from 2016. 3
What are the trends?
Target date funds’ explosive growth continues primarily because of the appeal of professional management of a participant’s asset allocation, fund selection, and glide path. The movement to custom models is largely borne out of a primary criticism that pre-packaged funds employ a “one size fits all” approach.
“Historically, TDF managers had little incentive to offer open-architecture solutions” says Adam Backman, Partner, Product Strategy for Lord Abbett. “As plan sponsors demand increased flexibility, investment managers are responding with additional choice.”
Daniel Bruns, Vice President, Strategy at Morningstar Investment Management LLC reports that he sees a push towards more customized solutions among plan sponsors. “Plan sponsors are realizing that customized defaults such as custom target solutions or managed accounts often allow for a better fit with plan demographics than off the shelf solutions.” He adds: “When you combine the better fit that customized solutions can provide with the price compression that we’ve seen over the past five years, custom solutions are becoming more attractive.”
Bruns says he is also witnessing interest from both small- and large-sized plan sponsors. “We are seeing smaller retirement plans embrace custom target date solutions, specifically semi-custom solutions, which use technology and improved recordkeeper connectivity to bring custom target date down-market in a scalable, efficient way,” he says.
What is specifically driving plan sponsor interest?
For their part, plan sponsors cite multiple reasons for adopting custom TDFs. Callan Institute’s 2019 Defined Contribution Trends survey4 ranked the top five motivations as follows: